PDA

View Full Version : TR3650 problems



Cheesesteak
11-18-2003, 3:33 AM
this thread is basically for will, luke, tim pierce, and anyone else who has the tremec manual in their GT...

http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=328655&page=1&pp=25[url]

if you go to the end, it all looks a little promising. i was curious if any of you guys had the whole "clunk" on the 1-2 or 2-3 shift.

anyways, thought you stang guys would wanna see this stuff.

-josh

HORSEpower
11-18-2003, 10:55 AM
It seems there are more people without problems than with. It is more likely that they are beating the crap out of the trannies, or shifting improperly.

Kurt

Grannynational
11-18-2003, 12:03 PM
Three friends of mine with TKO's to say when more than 450hp is applied to a tremic they have 3rd gear problems.

Three broken trannies and they are all running C4's now.

Joe

HORSEpower
11-18-2003, 12:19 PM
My Tremec has no problem with well over 450 hp, and it isn't even a TKO. We are talking about 3650s though, which is a totally different tranny.

C4s suck.

Kurt

Luke01GT
11-18-2003, 1:12 PM
Mine has always shifted hard into second

Cheesesteak
11-18-2003, 7:09 PM
yea i just spotted that thread and figured i'd share with ya'll.

mine kinda clunks a little, but to be honest with you, i think it's supposed to. it does sound like a few of the 3650's are lemons or something...

4U 2 NV
11-18-2003, 11:27 PM
my T56 is working just fine. Powershift after powershift its held up.

4U 2 NV
11-19-2003, 12:36 AM
and i cant wait till this clutch goes out. i want a spec stage 3 with billit flywheel.yeah baby yeah i shagged her rotten.

Mr. Bueno
11-19-2003, 4:43 PM
If you click here, u can see what the TR3650 uses. I use Mobil 1 Synthetic ATF in mine.

http://www.bullittarchive.com/Misc/Tremec/

--Tim

Also, if you go to the tremec website, you can dowload the service manual for that tranny, and it will say the same thing as the link I provided above.

Cheesesteak
11-19-2003, 5:19 PM
good info tim, thanks

HORSEpower
11-19-2003, 8:19 PM
Thanks Tim, good info.

Kurt

Cheesesteak
11-20-2003, 1:04 AM
echo echo

Mr. Bueno
11-20-2003, 7:37 PM
np, glad u all liked it. I liked it too myself.

grenning, u can also see on the tremec site, all the info for your tranny too. I even think you can download the entire service manual too for your tranny. :cheers:

--Tim

LethalBird
11-26-2003, 1:44 PM
My Tremec has no problem with well over 450 hp, and it isn't even a TKO. We are talking about 3650s though, which is a totally different tranny.

C4s suck.

Kurt

Your well over 450hp is only when u spray it and u only spray it once every year. Rather than that 370hp NA is ok for ur tranny to stay alive.

HORSEpower
11-28-2003, 12:42 AM
What's your point Eddie. The point is that the tranny resists a given amount of torque applied. Whether it takes it once a year or every day doesn't matter. The major factor is the resistance. I am running slicks and launching hard. My car on motor and slicks is a lot more load on the tranny then your car all out on drag radials.

Kurt

LethalBird
11-28-2003, 1:51 AM
What's your point Eddie. The point is that the tranny resists a given amount of torque applied. Whether it takes it once a year or every day doesn't matter. The major factor is the resistance. I am running slicks and launching hard. My car on motor and slicks is a lot more load on the tranny then your car all out on drag radials.

Kurt

My point is its gonna give up if u keep doing it. Just like a 10 bolt that can run slicks for once, twice or even 5 times, but eventually its gonna give up. Every car is got a week link somewhere, and u refuse to believe that ur car is like any other car. U just like to find out the hard way :D

Ponyperformance6
11-28-2003, 3:30 AM
I would be willing to bet that your tranny will give up the ghost long before Kurt's will. The 3550 is a race tranny plain and simple it is built for drag racing and is very tough. The T56 is built for street driving in the sense that it has to be smooth and also strong to handle the f-body/vette but not necesarily much over that. Personally I am convinced that a 5-speed is a better drag race tranny than a 6-speed for several reasons, and the durability of Kurt's is a good example.

LethalBird
11-28-2003, 2:34 PM
I really don't wanna get in a "I have better" comepetition. But a little info for u Will in case ur wondering. I rebuilt my tranny with a Viper T-56 parts all by D&D performance. I'll put it against Kurt's junk any day, not to mention that T-56 along with TH-400 is the best trannys out there no questions about it. I really don't know how did u come to the conclusion that my tranny will give up before Kurt's or even give up in the first place. What u are trying to argue is just gonna make u look stupid? :confused:
T-56 is set to take 500hp in showroom form working only at 80% capacity, the reason why Vipers and 03 Cobras have T-56.

Plus we are not talking about my tranny here, so lets stay focus on the subject.

toastychicken
11-28-2003, 3:30 PM
"I don't want to talk about flying...but lets talking about flying. I like flying, it provides alot of great views of sunrises and sunsets. Catching a good tailwind is always helpful, and landings are always fun (even if they are challenging.) Powered flight first began in 1903 when the Wright brothers....."

"But this topic isn't about flying, so lets stay on topic."

HORSEpower
11-28-2003, 6:27 PM
Eddie,

A Tremec 3550 is a race tranny, a T-56 is a street tranny. The gears and stuff in my tranny are beafy than in yours. If you look at the cut aways of the two trannies at a show, you will see the difference. A T-56 is no match for a T-3550.

Kurt

LethalBird
11-28-2003, 8:09 PM
Eddie,

A Tremec 3550 is a race tranny, a T-56 is a street tranny. The gears and stuff in my tranny are beafy than in yours. If you look at the cut aways of the two trannies at a show, you will see the difference. A T-56 is no match for a T-3550.

Kurt

If u say so

LethalBird
11-28-2003, 8:11 PM
"I don't want to talk about flying...but lets talking about flying. I like flying, it provides alot of great views of sunrises and sunsets. Catching a good tailwind is always helpful, and landings are always fun (even if they are challenging.) Powered flight first began in 1903 when the Wright brothers....."

"But this topic isn't about flying, so lets stay on topic."

Its better of u don't talk at all.

TheDan
12-03-2003, 11:42 PM
Who fucking cares?

Grannynational
12-04-2003, 10:41 AM
C4, TH400 :bowdown:

Joe

Ponyperformance6
12-04-2003, 5:31 PM
Here is something about flying for you... the concorde on take off power with all for afterburners lit, burns 180,000 lbs. of fuel per hour. Consider that for a moment. :bowdown: Concorde ..... too bad its gone now. :cry:

Will

Luke01GT
12-04-2003, 6:38 PM
The Concorde was neat, but economically it was a failure

Ponyperformance6
12-04-2003, 6:59 PM
tru

jeremy
12-08-2003, 1:27 PM
At full throttle my Jeep burns 240lbs of fuel per hour. Or, I should say it would if the tank was big enough to hold 240 lbs of fuel. It also sucks through 42,000 cubic feet of air in an hour.

So when you look at it from a distance....the concorde only burns 750 times as much fuel as my jeep....and further, when you concider it has 4 engines and I only have one, it only burns 187.5 times as much fuel per hour then my jeep does.

Jeremy

Ponyperformance6
12-08-2003, 6:11 PM
At full throttle my Jeep burns 240lbs of fuel per hour. Or, I should say it would if the tank was big enough to hold 240 lbs of fuel. It also sucks through 42,000 cubic feet of air in an hour.

So when you look at it from a distance....the concorde only burns 750 times as much fuel as my jeep....and further, when you concider it has 4 engines and I only have one, it only burns 187.5 times as much fuel per hour then my jeep does.

Jeremy


Wow.. very good point... and interesting to boot, but i shiver when i think what it took to figure that one out. :D hehe
Will

Grannynational
12-09-2003, 1:20 AM
The concord cant rock crawl. but the jeep can do mach 2, you just need more power.

Joe